The Veritas standard
Our editorial standard separates checkable facts from symbolic interpretation and keeps every reading in service of reflection.
Editorial principles
We label what can be checked, what comes from tradition, and what remains interpretation.
Factual claims—including astronomy, dates, historical context, named works, and calculation rules—should be checked against primary, institutional, or reputable reference sources appropriate to the subject.
Symbolic interpretations are presented as frameworks within Tarot, astrology, or numerology. We do not describe them as scientifically proven, universally agreed, or guaranteed to predict an event.
We prefer original documentation, recognized scientific institutions for astronomical facts, established reference works for history, and clearly identified source traditions for interpretation. Where schools disagree, we name the model being used rather than collapsing differences into one rule.
Every page should answer a real reader question, use original wording, avoid padded repetition, and preserve important limitations. Content is checked for internal consistency, unsafe certainty, unsupported factual claims, and whether the conclusion actually follows from the method described.
Digital tools, structured templates, automation, and AI-assisted research or drafting may support our workflow. They do not receive authorship or final authority. Published work remains the responsibility of the Veritas Editorial Team and must pass human editorial judgment before it is treated as finished.
We do not guarantee outcomes, diagnose conditions, predict death or disaster, or use fear-based language to drive a purchase. Relationship content must preserve consent and individual autonomy. High-impact decisions belong with qualified medical, mental-health, legal, or financial professionals.
A material update date should reflect a meaningful review, correction, or substantive improvement—not a cosmetic refresh. If you spot an error, send the page URL, the passage, and any supporting source to support@getveritas.app. We assess corrections on their evidence and relevance.
Veritas may invite readers to use its tools or app. That commercial relationship does not change the obligation to describe limitations honestly. We do not write fear into an interpretation to manufacture demand for a paid result.
The Veritas Editorial Team owns this standard. Last material review: .
